What Makes a Good Tenure Decision?

The tenure decision is one of the most examined processes in tenure-granting colleges and universities, with criteria, policies, mentoring programs, and considerable amounts of blood, sweat, and tears invested on the part of those being evaluated and those doing the evaluating. Much has been written about what it takes to achieve tenure, and most institutions have clear procedures and numerous checks and balances to guide a decision that has immense impact on individuals, on colleges and universities, and on higher education more broadly.

Day-to-day factors that can subtly yet profoundly influence the process by which tenure decisions are made tend to receive much less attention. Given the significant attention to the robustness of tenure processes and the appropriateness of tenure decisions, these factors may have no or only a marginal effect on the validity of the decisions themselves. However, they can have a profound impact on the experience of those who go through the process (both as the person being evaluated and as one doing the evaluating) and on the department’s ability to enact the tenure decision by welcoming a scholar into a permanent role in the department.

 

Factors that Affect the Experience of Making Tenure Decisions

  • Departmental norms about giving junior faculty feedback prior to tenure.
  • How the 3rd year review was conducted.
  • Faculty preparation for the tenure decision. (reading the tenure packet vs. relying only on the discussion to inform their decision)
  • Transparency of the voting process. (both secret and open voting systems work – but they have to be used appropriately)
  • Faculty understanding of the voting system. (e.g., do faculty understand that abstaining=a no vote in our university?)
  • Whether the discussion and the vote match. (the final vote should be easily understandable given the discussion)
  • Clear distinctions between fact and opinions. (including each faculty member checking the facts they think they have)
  • Interpretation and weight given to external letters. (e.g., when X says that someone else is better than our faculty member, are they making an appropriate comparison?)
  • Appropriately calibrated expectations. (e.g., if they published in Science early in their career, is it a warning sign that they have not published there since then? Or is it a signal of their unusual capabilities?)
  • An understanding of the difference between a unanimous decision and a decision made by majority. (note – the only difference should be that the unanimous decision is typically easier – there should be no difference in how that scholar is welcomed into the department or regarded after the tenure process is complete)

 

Read more about what changes with tenure in another blog post

 

 

Previous Post
Start with Heart – Ok, but which one?
Next Post
What Changes at Promotion to Full Professor?

On related topics

Why Some Faculty Choose Administration

Interest in administrative roles is often held with suspicion by academics. And yet, many high functioning faculty find themselves well-suited to leadership and wonder how they might do more. In fact, academic institutions and disciplines thrive only because of this inclination, however ambivalently held. Faculty are drawn toward leadership for a…

The Peculiarities of Academic Leadership, Introduction

Our work with faculty, using the CPI 260® assessment, shows us some of the unique shapes of academic leadership. We use the CPI assessment in much of our leadership-focused coaching with faculty, staff, and higher administration. The 260-question online assessment provides insight about how someone is likely to be viewed by…

The Extraordinary Productivity of Faculty

This series of posts describes what we’ve learned about the peculiarities of leadership in academia based on our work with the CPI 260® leadership assessment.  See the introduction to this series for background on this assessment. The biggest consistent difference we see between the leadership profile of business leaders and faculty…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.
You need to agree with the terms to proceed

keyboard_arrow_up