The Educational Case for Diversity and Inclusion

What does diversity have to do with higher education?

Diversity promotes learning. In their landmark Supreme Court case on Affirmative Action, the University of Michigan demonstrated that interactions across social identity differences have the potential to make us smarter. With this data, Michigan linked practice to mission, offering a compelling reason for colleges and universities to promote diversity and facilitate inclusion. In other words, Michigan provided an educational case for diversity and inclusion.

In The Difference, Scott Page uses mathematical modeling to reach a similar conclusion: variety enables a breadth and depth of resources that is superior to the ability of any individual to solve a given problem. Moreover, the more difficult the problem, the more this is true. Given the difficulties we face as a society and a world, and the role of higher education in addressing these difficulties, this work also underscores the unique and specific relationship between education, diversity, and inclusion.

How do we realize this potential?

But clearly these benefits don’t just happen on their own. If they did, access initiatives and head counts would be enough. What does it take for faculty, students, staff, and administrators to be ready to engage the opportunities and challenges that arise with diversity?

Patricia Gurin and colleagues demonstrate the importance of facilitated environments and dialogue skills through their research on intergroup dialogue. We must learn how to engage our diversity, and engage across our differences and the many and varied implications those differences have on our lives, if we are to benefit from our diversity. Dr. Gurin describes some of these findings in this keynote presentation at Villanova University.

Intergroup dialogue programs are a focused and effective place to learn such skills – but they are not enough. We must learn how to engage effectively across our differences in our daily interactions. In academia, this includes classrooms, department meetings, hallway conversations, labs, NSF review panels, and student advising. Each of us plays a role in creating the conditions for inclusion. Inclusion allows us to access the educational benefits of diversity.

How ready are you to actualize the benefits of diversity?

With our colleague, Dr. Mark Chesler, we created the BACKPACS Inventory.

BACKPACS - assess your readiness to support a diverse and inclusive cultureBACKPACS Inventory, 2017

The link above is a PDF of our BACKPACS Inventory, which helps individuals assess their own readiness to engage diversity. It also outlines the skills needed by everyday leaders to create inclusive environments where our diversity can flourish.

The BACKPACS Inventory is an extension of the Passion, Skills, Awareness, and Knowledge (PASK) model.  Beale, Thompson, and Chesler present PASK in their contribution to the volume edited by Schoem and Hurtado (2001).

 


Would you like to learn more about Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) in academia?

Or contact us to discuss what kinds of assistance we can offer to help increase DEI at your institution!

 

Previous Post
Three Approaches to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Next Post
#MeToo Leadership

On related topics

Dissonance as a Driver of Change

Dissonance drives change. The work of Piaget, Festinger and Lewin (among others) demonstrates that without dissonance, and the equally important process of resolution or integration, it is unlikely that people or organizations will let go of prior ideas and embrace new possibilities. What is Dissonance? Dissonance is the state created by…
Going virtual in a coronavirus-impacted global community: start with compassion

From In-Person to Virtual: Creating Virtual Meeting Norms

How do we go about setting up good virtual meeting norms (especially in a coronavirus-induced quick move to virtual meetings)? Well, let’s start with this: what does a good virtual meeting look like? The purpose is appropriately defined, the right people are there, critical preparations have been done, everyone is ready…

The Challenges of Making Change in Academia, Part II

Change requires coordination and buy-in.  Much of the training of expertise within academia still functions on the apprentice model.  New faculty learn “the ropes” via physical integration and (sometimes informal) mentorship from the seasoned faculty members.  Passing on your approaches and procedures within the institution’s system can foster a heightened sense…
keyboard_arrow_up