Three Approaches to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion

For diversity efforts to succeed, we need greater specificity about the meaning of these efforts and the strategies we might use to achieve these outcomes.

In our work, we categorize these efforts into three approaches: building representational diversity (what we can see and count), fostering interactional diversity (the capacity to engage diversity effectively), and committing to structural diversity (how an organization or institution enacts this commitment). This framework is developed in collaboration with Dr. Mark Chesler based on concepts described by Dr. Patricia Gurin and others.

The bulk of current broadening participation efforts focus on a limited form of structural diversity that is focused on achieving representational diversity. This is important work, but it is insufficient to the goal of realizing the benefits of diversity.

We believe that colleges and universities must define and develop interactional diversity as the leading edge of diversity efforts. Through this commitment we can move beyond access to retention and actualize the mutually beneficial, transformative, and multi-faceted nature of being a diverse society.  Read more about the educational case for diversity and inclusion in this blog post.

Representational Diversity Representational diversity - a heterogeneous group of people

Bring a more diverse set of people.

  • Invite and include
  • Enable
  • Engage and invest

Interactional Diversity

Interactional diversity - learning skills in interactions across differenceIncrease the capacity of diverse individuals to interact in a manner that actualizes the benefits of diversity.

  • Educate and train
  • Motivate
  • Engage and discuss
  • Empower and ally

Structural Diversity

Reflect a commitment to diversity in practice, policy, and governance throughout the institution.Structural diversity - a commitment to policies etc which support a diverse and inclusive culture

  • Provide focused programming and initiatives
  • Share power
  • Infuse DEI everywhere
  • Evaluate efforts
  • Reward and incentivize
  • Network
  • Invest in long term and interconnected ways

 

 

 

Previous Post
Creating Inclusive Classrooms
Next Post
The Educational Case for Diversity and Inclusion

On related topics

The Challenges of Making Change in Academia, Part III

Change requires coordination across roles.  Faculty and staff have broadly different foci, duties, and goals, as well as different levels and kinds of power within the institution and in relation to each other. Faculty and staff sometimes find it difficult to find common ground or clearly overlapping interests. Sometimes these differences…

Tectonic Plates, Ocean Liners, and Academe

Organizational change comes slowly in academia. While new centers and institutes may pop up easily with the influx of funding, the underlying structural realities that shape the lives of faculty, staff, and students remain powerfully consistent. The size and complexity of the organization, the primary orientation to internal drives and motivations…
Going virtual in a coronavirus-impacted global community: start with compassion

From In-Person to Virtual: Head, Heart, Hands

The coronavirus pandemic affects all of us, in unprecedented ways. Right now, most of us are facing increasing restrictions on our physical movement, forcing us to change how we conduct business and live our lives.  We are noticing that, in addition to the expertise we have explicitly sought to develop (around…
keyboard_arrow_up