The Educational Case for Diversity and Inclusion

What does diversity have to do with higher education?

Diversity promotes learning. In their landmark Supreme Court case on Affirmative Action, the University of Michigan demonstrated that interactions across social identity differences have the potential to make us smarter. With this data, Michigan linked practice to mission, offering a compelling reason for colleges and universities to promote diversity and facilitate inclusion. In other words, Michigan provided an educational case for diversity and inclusion.

In The Difference, Scott Page uses mathematical modeling to reach a similar conclusion: variety enables a breadth and depth of resources that is superior to the ability of any individual to solve a given problem. Moreover, the more difficult the problem, the more this is true. Given the difficulties we face as a society and a world, and the role of higher education in addressing these difficulties, this work also underscores the unique and specific relationship between education, diversity, and inclusion.

How do we realize this potential?

But clearly these benefits don’t just happen on their own. If they did, access initiatives and head counts would be enough. What does it take for faculty, students, staff, and administrators to be ready to engage the opportunities and challenges that arise with diversity?

Patricia Gurin and colleagues demonstrate the importance of facilitated environments and dialogue skills through their research on intergroup dialogue. We must learn how to engage our diversity, and engage across our differences and the many and varied implications those differences have on our lives, if we are to benefit from our diversity. Dr. Gurin describes some of these findings in this keynote presentation at Villanova University.

Intergroup dialogue programs are a focused and effective place to learn such skills – but they are not enough. We must learn how to engage effectively across our differences in our daily interactions. In academia, this includes classrooms, department meetings, hallway conversations, labs, NSF review panels, and student advising. Each of us plays a role in creating the conditions for inclusion. Inclusion allows us to access the educational benefits of diversity.

How ready are you to actualize the benefits of diversity?

With our colleague, Dr. Mark Chesler, we created the BACKPACS Inventory.

BACKPACS - assess your readiness to support a diverse and inclusive cultureBACKPACS Inventory, 2017

The link above is a PDF of our BACKPACS Inventory, which helps individuals assess their own readiness to engage diversity. It also outlines the skills needed by everyday leaders to create inclusive environments where our diversity can flourish.

The BACKPACS Inventory is an extension of the Passion, Skills, Awareness, and Knowledge (PASK) model.  Beale, Thompson, and Chesler present PASK in their contribution to the volume edited by Schoem and Hurtado (2001).

 


Would you like to learn more about Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) in academia?

Or contact us to discuss what kinds of assistance we can offer to help increase DEI at your institution!

 

Previous Post
Three Approaches to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
Next Post
Faculty Experiences with Coaching

On related topics

The Challenges of Making Change in Academia, Part I

Is making change in academia challenging? If so, why? We are so glad you asked. To understand the challenges of making change in academia, let’s take a look at the effects of different aspects of academic culture. We’ll also look at how existing change models fit – or not. Most change…
Separating and coming back together

Intent vs. Impact: Narrowing the Gap

Impact vs. intent: Yes, I’m talking about that much-dreaded moment when someone tells you that something you’ve just said or done hurts or has a negative impact in some way. Perhaps it came across as racist or sexist (or both), or demeaning in some other way. And you (and by “you”…

Tectonic Plates, Ocean Liners, and Academe

Organizational change comes slowly in academia. While new centers and institutes may pop up easily with the influx of funding, the underlying structural realities that shape the lives of faculty, staff, and students remain powerfully consistent. The size and complexity of the organization, the primary orientation to internal drives and motivations…
keyboard_arrow_up